Questions "simple" Lack of freedom El Pueblo, and a million questions ETA to end
Finally! We know the questions you want us the Basque regional president of the sovereign people. Surely no one would have thought that from the highest office of Euskadi had to resort to a plebiscite procedure to know what the good citizens of this country think about the need for ETA stop killing, extortion, threats, etc. . and having done all this and handed their weapons, discuss their final surrender.
The other question, is referred to the right to decide of the Basque Country. Talk of agreement of all Basque parties without exception. Not if you are thinking only parties that meet the law, or as we have come includes the radical nationalists.
Ibarretxe President, we knew we had, and has a fixation with the right to decide and the word. That's OK, we must fulfill what is promised, but all that is promised. "The consultation will be made in the absence of violence ....
His two companions, the Political Council, in presenting the proposal, both in-Enea Ajuria, as in the Basque Parliament, it seems that besides being partners of Government employees are required to give greater credibility and plurality to "consultation", although this does not comply with the law. "Partners or useful idiots?
has put the icing the Minister of Justice, or should we say about injustice? This person is not speaking from his party if EA or did as a Director. He said, more or less than ETA can be calm because the Prime Minister of Spain, just talk to them, with the ETA, and not to the legitimate representatives of the Basque people. You need to have Mr. Azkarraga nose. In a country where it is common for public demonstrations of its leaders end up before the Fiscal, then before a judge and then in prison, this man, have all the tickets so they can be seen as insulting the President Rodríguez Zapatero. Not for me to denounce him, but ....
To this proposal by the Basque Government, I wonder: Does the University of the Basque Country, through the "EUSKO BAROMETER" can not answer the two questions as it seeks to formulate the Lehendakari, or sorting a few more of the proposed text a better understanding of citizens? We are accustomed to being told what they think the Basques of their leaders, what concerns them most: violence, unemployment, the high cost of housing, shopping cart, the education of our children, health, immigration, etc.. So I think that the formula of the survey, or sociological, as I like to be called, is best if you really want to know what citizens think of our little country.
Another thing is that what you want is a confrontation between Basques, dialectical course, preparing the next elections to Parliament and seek to exploit the traditional domestic victims of the English do not let us decide. I think it's the latter.
Lehendakari still find that in this Basque society divided into three parts: those who threaten and kill, the threatened and killed and those who are neither one thing nor the other, about half, you can not do social experiments serve to radicalize social life more than it already is. The lack of freedom of a large part of this his people, is sensational.
Moreover, the nationalist leaders would do well not to deceive the public when they say that he wants to do the same thing as Ibarretxe is announcing Patxi López if it becomes Lehendakari. No mistake, Patxi cross-industry agreement among the Basques, to make a proposal to the Basque Parliament, the English Parliament and a referendum in Euskadi. Everything inside the legality of amending the Statute and in the English Constitution.
And all that raises questions at all, to stay the same: threatened, extorted, without the freedom to make policy, etc.. That if Lehendakari, you will be pleased that he will have done what he promised. Lament find that you are not the Chair of all Basques.
