This course calls on citizen participation, promoted by the Provincial Council of Gipuzkoa is providing for different regions of the territory.
As a longtime participant in the neighborhood is, I signed on it to see what was new in this field and try to learn something. 3, 4 and 5 June were the dates in Irun and the area of \u200b\u200bBidasoa-Txingudi, in schedule from 19 to 21 hours, was given the said course. The organization was handled by Baketik, which in turn, commissioned by teachers from the University of the Basque Country the first two modules on "Reflections on Theory and citizen participation" and "Map of experiences and options for citizen participation." The module three, "Workshop proposals on participation and conflict resolution "in charge of carrying it out was Lokarri.
The first day the turnout was about 20 people of the thirty which organizers had registered, the second we were about ten and the third just a dozen. As seen, the turnout was quite low in number.
The theory of participation and experience, was not to throw rockets, but I where I want to focus is in the shop the last day. Lokarri the person was a young, brash and very good use of words, I would say that brilliant in his presentation. We explain the theory of conflict: that all human relationships is subject to the conflict, that the solution must be treated the same there are no winners or losers, setting minimal ethical to keep in mind always, and so on. and a few reasons on how to act to solve them. We set some rules for participation in the debate and then conducted a round of general interventions. We
practical experience which was a reflection of five minutes, and then put on paper our ideas for resolving conflict. We said you could raise any conflict, but we took that we think in the Basque conflict. We had a time of two minutes to present our ideas, another turn to ask about what we had not understood the thoughts of others, and finally, a minute to explain what we had looked better or more innovative than it had been said. It remained for the final evaluation of the matches.
I discuss below some of the things that they said need to end violence, recognize the conflict, feelings and give voice to the people, the politicians give us another picture and recognize that they have been wrong, the ETV as a tool for discussions; back on track recently, improving information and why of things, listening and understanding based on respect, that the parties agree, and without justice there will be peace religion as a cause of conflict, and because of the conflict analysis, find the points of contact between the legitimate representatives of society and devise possible solutions. There was only one that spoke of another conflict, that of immigration. He said that perhaps had not understood.
As will be seen, only one person talks to end violence, nobody remembers the victims and the lack of freedom for those in politics without being nationalistic. To the question that you want to refer a person with the of: "there must be justice for peace", he replied that any injustice will have occurred. It's like throwing a stone and hide your hand, I do not se, but have some reason to continue the violence. Of course no one said this, but my interpretation of the response. Another raises the need for an agreement between the two strongest parties in the autonomous region, PNV and PSE-EE, which in any case must be added others, and fundamentalism as the origin and continuation of the conflict. I think it was a good reflection.
I got worried, because it seems that the strategy of Lehendakari and some nationalist, is catching on in a part of society. It is true that the sample of Irun is very small and the findings in another region of Guipuzcoa, the same day, was that Ibarretxe resign, leaving the way to hope. I anyway After three days, I have grown little, I learned something and I have frustrated a lot.
0 comments:
Post a Comment