Quinine Dichloromethane

Security Roles and Euskotren

Politically Incorrect 1

Va spies, patriots, traitors and supporters of freedom ... ...

In recent weeks, various reports have been published about the roles of the Department of State, U.S. of America in its relations with leaders of all countries. They are told in private conversations and others surely less so, always in words of any officer or American ambassador and therefore the bias point of view of the guy in question.

In my view, not only gossip and jokes that reveal the papers in question, since it seems clear that the pressures are different governments to take measures to promote U.S. interests or citizens and companies. I think no one will tear their hair out by these facts, which many recognize as the work of any diplomat. Another thing is the rudeness with which, I understand, are manifested in many cases revealing the arrogance of American government.

is talk of the need for transparency in all acts of governments and citizens have the right to know. Okay, I have no doubt about it, but to know the truth, not the story that a "friend" tells me that I in turn interpret it to satisfy pays me the salary.

I came to mind a spy movie, which were obliged to steal secret project plans, meet industrial strategies and policies, to know where a country is more or less friend. Poison to bring decisions closer to what interests them, try to change governments, etc. That is the role, apparently, of the American embassies.

For roles of the famous American State Department, it appears that filters the information who is a holy man and the newspapers that published the champions of democracy because they allow us to know things that we hide and therefore make us more free.

I thought, and I think, to enter a home or office and take something, a document or other thing, it was a steal! The thief does not want to profit from what has been taken, but think you may have morbid you know what he has achieved, and what happens to some experts to do what they see fit: to publish. How can they call the latter? Perhaps complicit in theft? Who stands up for what is ethical or not, in this case? Would you think it was leaked sensitive information to individuals or of any company, including media, obtained through espionage, or other?

I think our freedom is seriously threatened.